ACLU: We Make Up Things As We Go Along

As reported by Taylor Millard for Hot Air:

The American Civil Liberties Union no longer believes in civil liberties for all. It now believes in civil liberties for everyone but Christian businesses and nonprofits who don’t agree with the ACLU on gay marriage or contraception. Their announcement comes in an op-ed in The Washington Post declaring they can no longer support the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act:

The ACLU supported the RFRA’s passage at the time because it didn’t believe the Constitution, as newly interpreted by the Supreme Court, would protect people such as Iknoor Singh, whose religious expression does not harm anyone else. But we can no longer support the law in its current form. For more than 15 years, we have been concerned about how the RFRA could be used to discriminate against others. As the events of the past couple of years amply illustrate, our fears were well-founded. While the RFRA may serve as a shield to protect Singh, it is now often used as a sword to discriminate against women, gay and transgender people and others. Efforts of this nature will likely only increase should the Supreme Court rule — as is expected — that same-sex couples have the freedom to marry.

In the Hobby Lobby case last year, a Supreme Court majority blessed the use of the RFRA by businesses to deny employees insurance coverage for contraception, a benefit guaranteed by law, if those businesses object on religious grounds and there is some other means of furthering the government’s interests. Religiously affiliated nonprofit organizations such as universities are taking the argument further. They invoke the RFRA to argue not only that they should not have to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives, but also that they should not even have to notify the government that they refuse to do so because, they maintain, notification would trigger the government to intervene to ensure coverage.

The most amusing part later on in the op-ed is when ACLU Deputy Legal Director Louise Melling promises the group still believes in religious freedom.

Yes, religious freedom needs protection. But religious liberty doesn’t mean the right to discriminate or to impose one’s views on others. The RFRA wasn’t meant to force employees to pay a price for their employer’s faith, or to allow businesses to refuse to serve gay and transgender people, or to sanction government-funded discrimination. In the civil rights era, we rejected the claims of those who said it would violate their religion to integrate. We can’t let the RFRA be used as a tool for a different result now.

The ACLU really seems to twist itself into a knot so much they have ……

FULL STORY HERE:

ACLU: RFRAs are great except when they protect Christians « Hot Air


hypocracy-meter
IMAGE FROM guyanachronicle.com

Leave a Comment

Comment via Facebook

Comment via Disqus