Here is the reason that the gun control crowd sounds so farcical. Thomas Sowell nails it when he writes that emotional rhetoric is NOT an argument. Empirical data is needed to see what restrictive gun control brings to a nation. The data shows that violent gun crimes rise as good citizens have less and less access to guns. Just look at Chicago, if you want an example. Read the story below.
As Written By Thomas Sowell for Townhall:
Surely murder is a serious subject, which ought to be examined seriously. Instead, it is almost always examined politically in the context of gun control controversies, with stock arguments on both sides that have remained the same for decades. And most of those arguments are irrelevant to the central question: Do tighter gun control laws reduce the murder rate?
That is not an esoteric question, nor one for which no empirical evidence is available. Think about it. We have 50 states, each with its own gun control laws, and many of those laws have gotten either tighter or looser over the years. There must be tons of data that could indicate whether murder rates went up or down when either of these things happened.
But have you ever heard any gun control advocate cite any such data? Tragically, gun control has become one of those fact-free issues that spawn outbursts of emotional rhetoric and mutual recriminations about the National Rifle Association or the Second Amendment.
If restrictions on gun ownership do reduce murders, we can repeal the Second Amendment, as other Constitutional Amendments have been repealed. Laws exist to protect people. People do not exist to……
Full Story Here: