Judge Andrew Napolitano has come up with a disturbing list of what-if questions concerning our government and our presidential candidates. This article will cause you to pause and reflect on the answers and the outcomes they represent, This will make your head or your heart heart for our nation. The good news is that there is still time to affect the outcome of every one of these what-ifs. Read more in this fine article.
By Judge Andrew P. Napolitan0 FoxNews.com:
There’s not a dime’s worth of difference between them
What if our system of governance is so deep into the fabric of big government in the second decade of the 21st century that all the presidential candidates really believe that most voters actually want the government to care for them?
What if all major candidates in both major political parties promise a federal government that can right any wrong, regulate any behavior, tax any event, solve any problem and borrow unlimited amounts of money?
What if the federal government is broke? What if it is politically committed to spending more money than it collects in revenue? What if all the candidates believe in borrowing money today and again borrowing money next year to pay off today’s debts? What if rolling over federal debt never pays off or even pays down the principal?
What if none of the candidates cares about increasing the inflationary pressures and tax burdens on generations of Americans as yet unborn? What if they all want to spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year more than is collected in revenue? What if they all refuse to address the issue of how to pay back responsibly all the borrowed money from the past 100 years?