Utah Reigning In Federal Police Forces?

It goes without question that there is too much over reach in the Federal Government when it comes to police forces. Every department seems to have its own force and some of these have become highly militarized. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) an the U. S. Forestry Service are just two examples. There is a movement afoot to strip some of these forces out and put law enforcement where it belongs. It belongs at the local level. This new bill in the U. S. House will do that very thing. Be sure you support it.

Jason Chavetz

As Written By PETE KASPEROWICZ, First Appeared at The Washington Examiner:

Utah Republicans push to strip police powers from feds.

Utah’s four House Republicans introduced a bill Wednesday that would strip the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service of their power to police federal lands, and give that power over to local cops.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz and his three GOP colleagues from Utah introduced the Local Enforcement for Local Lands Act.

The lawmakers say the growth of police authorities in both agencies has distracted them from their main mission of managing federal land, and has created conflicts with local authorities. They also say federal agents are not as trusted as local police, and should be removed.

“Federal agencies do not enjoy the same level of trust and respect as local law enforcement that are deeply rooted in local communities,” Chaffetz and other lawmakers said. “This legislation will help de-escalate conflicts between law enforcement and local residents while improving transparency and accountability.”

Read more on WashingtonExaminer.com

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Leave a Comment

Comment via Facebook

Comment via Disqus

  • liberalssuck

    It is a start..

  • Roy

    I can see taking them away from BLM but not from the Forestry Service. Local police agencies don’t have the manpower and time to police places like national parks and national forests. I can see taking them away from other federal agencies that don’t need them, as well. But it should be on a case by case basis to consider whether it’s appropriate for local agencies to be required to take over their functions.

  • suqsid4

    Don’t follow Chaffetz, but he’s great when I’m paying attention.