What Huma Abedin’s Muslim Journal Claimed About Bill Clinton

Huma Abedin was an assistant editor at the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. It published an article saying what the mainstream media and the Clinton News Network refused to say: Bill Clinton bombed Iraq to distract from the Monica Lewinski affair. This was published in 2002 after the 1998 bombing. Get the sordid details here.

As Written By LOUISE BOYLE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM:

An article in the Muslim journal where Huma Abedin was assistant editor claimed Bill Clinton bombed Saddam Hussein to deflect from his Monica Lewinsky affair.

The claim made made in an article published in the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, where Abedin was a member of the editorial board – the group of people who decide what is published in the academic journal.

It is the latest bombshell to emerge from the archives of the journal, whose editor-in-chief is Abedin’s mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, an academic in Saudi Arabia.

Abedin, who is not an academic, and has been Hillary Clinton’s closest aide since spending time as an intern at the White House, at exactly the time the Monica Lewinsky scandal was unfolding.

  • Huma Abedin, Clinton’s right-hand woman, was for 12 years the assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 
  • In 2002 the supposedly academic journal published claims by a Canadian law student about the 1998 bombing Bill Clinton ordered in Iraq
  • Sina Ali Musati claimed he did it as a distraction from the Monica Lewinsky scandal – which was then at its height
  • Clinton campaign claims Abedin was not involved in actually editing the magazine saying she was ‘just on the masthead’
  • But did not explain how that squared with her being on the editorial board 
  • Her mother is editor-in-chief and suggested U.S. was responsible for 9/11 while another article said Jews were ‘adept’ at influencing politics 

THERE IS MORE!!

Full Story Here:

Huma Abedin’s journal claims Bill Clinton bombed Iraq to distract from affair | Daily Mail Online

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Leave a Comment

Comment via Facebook

Comment via Disqus

  • Yankee ’42

    That’s very well documented, and for once (and maybe the only time in my lifetime) I concurred with her, but she’s still the enemy within.

    Why hasn’t anyone link the Clinton Foundation scheme to the Obama Foundation just yet? He knew what was going on, and most likely he got some of the money as well, because it’s what they do, and always have done.

  • sweetqueen777

    Ms. Abedin has long been known to have connections with the Muslim Brotherhood, and other Muslim Radical groups. Her family are radicalized Muslims. She is married to the Pervert Creep, Anthony Weiner. She and Hilary are WAY too close for comfort, which leads me to think perhaps they are lesbian lovers. (Both being married to oversexed Creeps and all.) My question is HOW DID THIS WOMAN EVER PASS THE SECURITY CHECKS? As Hillary’s bestie and most trusted assistant, she has been given access to much more than she should have been.

  • iprazhm

    Excuse me while I refuse to believe an islamic terrorist that worked to bring my country down and kill my people. She has the credibility of a snake. There’s nothing she wouldn’t do or say to advance the reign of Islamic terrorism.

  • Les Morpions

    Thing is, it doesn’t matter what is revealed about Abedin or the Clintons and their nefarious deeds. Dyed in the wool Clintonites will still vote for Clinton. They don’t care. They don’t care about all the criminality, the lying, the obfuscation, the treason.
    It is clear and proven. The Clintons are guilty of serious federal criminality. Anyone who votes for Clinton is enabling a criminal to steer this country which way they will.. And, reap untold personal benefits along the way while Americans toil, are taxed and legislated into the corner, and fall closer and closer to “developing nation” status. All while the snotty Clintons get rich.
    My suggestion is that if you know someone who claims to be planning to vote for Clinton, you find some “way” to persuade them against that folly. Not going to suggest “ways”. I’ll leave that up to you…