Why Judge Neil Gorsuch is Just What We Need

Neil Gorsuch, a Judge on 10 Circuit Appeals Court has been nominated by President Trump to be the next Supreme Court Judge. Judge Gorsuch has all the markings of a great Constitutionalist Judge. He will be deserving of our support. President Trump has delivered on another campaign promise. 

As Written By Andrew Walker for The Federalist:

Tonight, President Trump rewarded social conservatives and delivered on his campaign promise by nominating Neil Gorsuch, a Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, to the United States Supreme Court.

By his record, social conservatives have much to applaud and gain at the prospect of Neil Gorsuch taking a seat on our nation’s highest court.

Who is Neil Gorsuch, and where does he stand on issues important to social conservatives?

Gorsuch, 49, was appointed to the 10th Circuit in 2006 by George W. Bush. His nomination generated little controversy, and he was confirmed with a voice vote by the U.S. Senate. A graduate of Columbia, Harvard Law, and Oxford, he is praised for his eloquent legal prose, intellectual gifts, and is heralded by conservatives for his textualist and orginalist interpretations of the Constitution. It is no surprise that his appointment fills the vacuum left by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death.

Gorsuch has garnered significant praise from Robert P. George, the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University and arguably the nation’s most influential social conservative intellectual. On Facebook, George issued the following praise for Gorsuch: “He would be a superb Supreme Court justice. He is intellectually extremely gifted and is deeply committed ……


Social Conservatives Should Rally Around Neil Gorsuch



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Leave a Comment

Comment via Facebook

Comment via Disqus

  • Beckah

    I hope and pray Trump gets the opportunity to appoint THREE or FOUR more just like Gorsuch! Perhaps then, sanity can be restored to the Republic!

    I think that Republicans need to show some restraint and use caution when discussing the “nuclear option” in regard to appointments to the bench. Every little step in that direction moves us closer to a “Democracy” and further from a “Republic”, and that’s NOT a direction I wish to see! And yes, I DO understand the argument of “Dirty Harry started this”, and “they wouldn’t hesitate”.

  • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

    No, what America needs is biblically qualified justices throughout the entire nation who judge on behalf Yahweh (instead of man) and His perfect law and altogether righteous judgments*:

    “…The Bible stipulates, among other things, that judicial appointees must be men of truth who fear Yahweh and hate covetousness. (See Chapter 5 “Article 2: Executive Usurpation” for a list of additional Biblical qualifications.) The United States Constitution requires no Biblical qualifications whatsoever [made all-but impossible by Article 6’s Christian test ban]. Nowhere does the Constitution stipulate that judges must rule on behalf of Yahweh, rendering decisions based upon His commandments, statutes, and judgments as required in Exodus 18. That not even one constitutional framer contended for Yahweh,3 as did King Jehoshaphat, speaks volumes about the framers’ disregard for Him and His judicial system:

    ‘And he [King Jehoshaphat] set judges in the land throughout all the fenced cities of Judah, city by city, and said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for YHWH,4 who is with you in the judgment…. And he charged them, saying, Thus shall ye do in the fear of YHWH, faithfully, and with a perfect heart.’ (2 Chronicles 19:5-9)….”

    For more, see online Chapter 6 “Article 3: Judicial Usurpation” of “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt6.html.

    Then find out how much you REALLY know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a complimentary copy of a book that EXAMINES the Constitution by the Bible.

    *See Psalm 19:7-11

    • Grundune

      Just because the Constitution doesn’t stipulate requirements for folks seeking public appointments doesn’t mean the public can’t demand only good men are appointed.

      That is not a reason to abolish the Constitution and install a dictator. You are very political for a preacher.

    • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

      Grundune: Dictator!?! “There are no such things done as thou sayest, but thou feignest them out of thine own heart.” (Nehemiah 6:8)

      Grundune is a Mormon who rejects the Christ of the Bible and the Word of God (Psalm 19:7-11; John 1:1-3, 14; 1 Timothy 3:16; 2 John 1:7-11; etc.) and whose Doctrine and Covenants demand he defend the Constitution as divinely inspired (D&C 101:80, etc.), much the same as with the Book of Mormon. He knows if the Constitution is exposed for the biblically seditious document it is, that the entire Mormon house of cards comes tumbling down.

      He also rejects that Christ is our (ONLY) King (whom Grundune likes to identify as a dictator but is clueless as to how he does so) now, despite a plethora of New Testament passages that prove otherwise. See blog article “The Kingdom is Not of the World But in the World” at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/objection-the-kingdom-is-not-of-this-world/.

      Tragically, many Christians are more inclined to follow Doctrine and Covenants than they are the Bible when it comes to the Constitution.

  • Gregory Alan of Johnson

    This populace has a secular authority for the horizontal, and a Biblical for the vertical. since the horizontal cannot be an authority for the eternity we all must face, why is it we do not take the Biblical vertical authority and make it both directions? Don’t want to live in a “Theocracy”? Too damn bad, as the Constitution already has become one with many who actually literally/erroneously believe it is Divinely inspired (definitely not by the Holy Spirit). Given the choice of the Torah of Yahweh vs the Constitution, I’ll take the Torah. In the name of Yeshua/Jesus, Amen.