A Russian company that doesn’t exist gets indicted?

Yesterday at the top of the stair, Mueller indicted a Russian company that wasn’t there. It wasn’t there again today. Mueller may wish this company would go away. How does a top lawman and lawyer make such a mistake? This is like a scene from that old comic mafia movie: The Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight. One of the Russian companies did not exist during the time specified in the indictment. It will be interesting to see and learn how the Special Counsel Team of Robert Mueller managed to pull this off. In their haste to throw up a public relations smokescreen for their failing investigation lead to this error? Who gets held accountable for this?

As Written and Reported By Ryan Saavedra for the Daily Wire:

This week, one of the Russian companies accused by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of funding a conspiracy to meddle in the 2016 U.S. presidential election was revealed in court to not have existed during the time period alleged by Mueller’s team of prosecutors, according to a lawyer representing the Defendant.

U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked Eric Dubelier, one of two lawyers representing the accused Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, if he was representing a third company listed in Mueller’s indictment.

“What about Concord Catering?” Harvey asked Dubelier. “The government makes an allegation that there’s some association. I don’t mean for you to – do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?”

“We’re not,” Dubelier responded. “And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we’re dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich.”

“That company didn’t exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the …..


Mueller Indicted A Russian Company That Didn’t Even Exist, Court Transcripts Say | Daily Wire


Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.