This is an interesting look at former FBI Director James Comey and the definition of what it takes to interfere with an investigation. In this analysis, you will see the words “corrupt” and “intent.” If you will recall, Hillary Clinton was given a pass on all her compromising of classified emails based on intent. As far as saying President Trump had a corrupt intent, please! Try and prove that.
As Written By Kathryn Blackhurst for Polizette:
Andrew McCarthy says investigation into Trump interference ‘frivolous,’ no proof of ‘corrupt’ intent.
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Andrew McCarthy expressed incredulity at former FBI Director James Comey’s inability to answer whether President Donald Trump attempted to “obstruct” the investigation into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. He spoke during an interview Thursday on “The Laura Ingraham Show.”
McCarthy, a contributing editor for National Review, said he could not believe that Comey replied, “I don’t know well enough to answer” whether the president’s words regarding the Flynn investigation constituted an “obstruction of justice” during his testimony on Capitol Hill Thursday. In his opening statement, Comey said that Trump told him, “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”
“He’s the [former] FBI director, and he knows more than anybody on the planet about obstruction of justice. He was a prosecutor for the better part of 30 years, he was the deputy attorney general, and he’s a very good prosecutor,” McCarthy said. “So the thought that if there had been an obstruction of justice that he had witnessed, and was the only witness to, and knew it well enough to go down and write a memo about it to describe the whole thing — that he couldn’t make a judgment about the whole thing … that means that nobody can……
KEEP READING HERE: