At some point she’s just slandering, right? How long can she go on these crazy rants pretty much about nothing or lacking the proof of whatever she thinks she knows? Take this as an example…
In the sorry of explanations, Lynch flailed about telling Chuck Todd the reason the FBI deleted the name of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and the Islamic State from transcripts.
As Written By Jack Shaffer for Politico Magazine:
Mateen: I pledge allegiance to [omitted] may God protect him [in Arabic], on behalf of [omitted].
Lynch’s exercise in censorship drew immediate ridicule from Florida Gov. Rick Scott, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and others. “Selectively editing this transcript is preposterous. We know the shooter was a radical Islamist extremist inspired by ISIS,” Ryan said in a Twitter statement. “The administration should release the full, unredacted transcript so the public is clear-eyed about who did this, and why.”
By mid-afternoon, Lynch’s Justice Department and the FBI had caved to the pressure and un-redacted the transcripts, saying the deletions had “caused unnecessary distraction from the hard work that the FBI and our law enforcement partners have been doing to investigate this heinous crime.”
Hold on just a minute! The nation’s top cop of all people should have been able to predict a hell storm of bad publicity and partisan rock throwing after she bowdlerized a terrorist’s mundane declaration of evil. What Lynch and the FBI did was inexcusable, and she shouldn’t have been surprised.
Speaking on Meet the Press yesterday, Lynch offered Chuck Todd the flimsiest of explanations for why the FBI deleted the name of the leader (Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi) and the organization (Islamic State) from the transcript in the first place, especially seeing as the FBI had previously…….
KEEP READING HERE: