NYT Reporter Goes After The Obama Admin’s Deliberate Lies Of Omission

NYT reporter, a foreign correspondent, has been digging into the reams of files surrounding Osama bin Laden’s death and the strength of al Queda. It is now clear that in the runup to the 2012 elections, President Obama managed the release of files to mislead America on the abilities of al Queda. Almost half a million document released by the Trump administration is painting this very different storyline.  

As Written By Jenna Lifhits for the Weekly Standard:

A top foreign correspondent at the New York Times said Friday that the Obama administration deliberately downplayed al Qaeda’s strength in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election.

“The overall narrative that I think was being pushed to the press, and if you look back at the editorials that were done when that trove came out, was an image of bin Laden isolated, he had lost control of this group,” Rukmini Callimachi said during an event at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, referring to the 17 hand-picked documents released by the Obama administration in May of 2012.

Her remarks triggered the following question from Kim Dozier, a former top correspondent for the Associated Press and CBS, and current executive editor of the Cipher Brief: “Do you think that was something that was kept from the public’s view because it revealed that there had to be reams of communication going back and forth, which means U.S. intelligence, Western intelligence, was missing this?”

“Think back to when bin Laden was killed. It was 2011, it was right before a major campaign season. I don’t want to underplay the role that the killing of Osama bin Laden had,” said Callimachi. “But I think that that was theorized into something much bigger.”

“The head of the organization has been killed, and now—these are literally quotes ……..

KEEP READING THERE IS WAY MORE HERE:

New York Times Reporter: Obama Administration Misled on al Qaeda | The Weekly Standard

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.