The Obama Team Didn’t Want You To Know One Thing About The al Qaeda-Iran Alliance

One thing that Team Obama seems to have gotten down to an art was lying by omission. If they did not tell you everything and you came to a wrong conclusion, they got you there but without a direct lie. It was your fault that you got the wrong answers. 

That seems to be the case in the volumes of records seized in the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. By sitting on these records and releasing a set few, the Obama admin allowed it to seem as if al Qaeda had been defeated to the point of no longer a threat.

This allowed President Obama to proceed with the Iran nuclear deal. that was one of his legacies. It is built upon a lie as events have shown. 

As Written By Post Editorial Board for the New York Post:

CIA Director Mike Pompeo has just released hundreds of thousands of documents, long withheld by the Obama administration, that were seized in the 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

There are no surprise revelations — but they more fully document the years-long extensive cooperation between al Qaeda and Iran that was still ongoing when bin Laden met his end.

And that raises even more disturbing questions about the nuclear deal Team Obama cut — and the real reason these documents weren’t disclosed until now.

Particularly a 19-page assessment by a senior jihadist of the al Qaeda-Tehran ties: how Iran supplied “everything [we] needed,” including “money, arms” and “training in Hezbollah camps in Lebanon,” as well as safe haven for other jihadis.

Yes, there were occasional conflicts and jealousies — but not enough to sever the relationship, which bin Laden himself described as post-2001 al Qaeda’s “main artery for funds, personnel and ……


What Team Obama didn’t want you to know about the al Qaeda-Iran alliance | New York Post

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.