This Is Most Likely The Proof That No Collusion Evidence Exists Connecting Trump to Russia

With a bit of connecting the dots of the Strzok text messages, it is easy to see that collusion evidence connecting the Trump campaign and Russian did not exist. It did not exist then and nothing has turned up as of this report. the chances of anything ever turning up seem very slim. This means that the Robert Mueller Witch Hunt must now resort to finding or creating process crimes to justify its existence. Look at what Peter Strzok was considering before joining the Special Counsel team. 

As Written and Reported By Chuck Ross for the Daily Caller:

After 10 months of leading the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation, counterintelligence official Peter Strzok had not seen compelling evidence that President Trump or high-level campaign officials colluded with the Russian government, according to a person familiar with his thinking.

That account comports with a May 19, 2017 text exchange between Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page that was released earlier this week.

“You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern that there’s no big there there,” Strzok wrote to Page, his mistress.

Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, disclosed the “jaw-dropping” text earlier this week. He said that the message suggested that the FBI investigators had seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.

It was unclear exactly what Strzok meant by the message, but the source close to Strzok affirmed that interpretation of the exchange to The Daily Caller.

The source spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

In the exchange with …..


Strzok Hadn’t Seen Collusion Evidence Be | The Daily Caller

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.