What Immigration promise did John Kelly want kept by the President?

President Trump’s Chief of Staff John Kelly is not a big fan of immigration resettlement. His advice to President Trump was a little more severe than most of his advisors. During the Presidential campaign, Donald Trump made a few promises regarding immigration. 

There have been a lot of numbers bounced around over how wide the gate should be opened and how many immigrants should be resettled. Numbers as high as 100,000 per year have been put forth. Also, numbers that ranged from 20,000 to 50,000. John Kelly does not come close to any of those ranges. What kind of control over this will the White House chief of staff have over the final number?

As Written by John Binder for Breitbart: 

President Trump’s Chief of Staff John Kelly reportedly advised the administration to hold true to a campaign promise that would essentially suspend the mass refugee resettlement program, according to the New York Times.

The report reveals how Kelly had pushed the Trump administration to lower the number of foreign refugees entering the United States down to between zero and one refugee a year, a virtual suspension of the program altogether, as Trump previously promised to do during the 2016 presidential campaign.

This past summer, the Trump administration debated lowering the annual cap on refugees admitted to the United States. Should it stay at 110,000, be cut to 50,000 or fall somewhere in between? John F. Kelly offered his opinion. If it were up to him, he said, the number would be between zero and one.

Instead of taking the advice of Kelly, the White House has set the foreign refugee resettlement cap at 45,000 foreign nationals coming to the U.S. through the program a year, as ……..


Report: John Kelly Advised Trump to Stick to Immigration Promise by Halting All Refugee Resettlement – Breitbart

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.