What The FISA Memo Debate Is REALLY About

[VIDEO] The FISA Memo is more than just whether the FISA Court has been subjected to abuses by the FBI, the DOJ, ad the Obama administration. The real question is the legitimacy or illegitimacy of the probe by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. if the Christopher Steele Russian dossier was the basis for the investigation and it was presented as valid intelligence, then the Russian collusion probe is based on a falsehood. In this video, Tom Fitton of Judicial watch explains the problems that will arise. 

As Written, Reported By and Seen First On Fox News:

A controversial memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs is headed to President Donald Trump’s desk after the House Intelligence Committee voted Monday along party lines to release the memo.

Some House Republicans have claimed the memo contains “disturbing” information on how the FISA surveillance program was used to target the Trump campaign.

Trump has five working days to review the contents but is widely expected not to block its release.

On “Fox & Friends First” on Tuesday morning, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the memo could contain damning information about the Justice Department, the FBI and former FBI Director James Comey.

It the end, however, it is really about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, Fitton said.

He noted there has been speculation that the memo reveals Mueller used the unverified Christopher Steele dossier on Trump and Russia to justify his probe.

Fitton pointed out that many individuals who allegedly committed surveillance abuses during the Obama administration were also involved in setting up Mueller’s operation, including the “ambush interview” of former National Security Adviser ……..


Fitton: ‘The FISA Memo Debate Is About Whether Mueller’s Operation Is Legitimate or Not’ | Fox News Insider

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.