For a year or more now, the Democrats and their mainstream media minions have been seeing evidence of collusion at every turn. Each week and sometimes daily, the headlines erupt that the evidence has been discovered that will tie President Donald Trump to the Russians. That tune has been played for a long time and even the minions are getting tired of it. What then, will be the new strategy to commit a coup against a legally elected President? You do what any good liberal would do, you go re-define the meanings of the terms. Just look at this grasping of straws.
As Written and Reported By Peter Hasson for the Daily Caller:
- Democrats accused the Trump campaign of working with the Russian hackers who stole campaign emails
- 13 months into the Trump presidency, Democrats still have no proof of collusion
- Now they’re trying to change the definition of “collusion” to keep the narrative alive
Lacking any evidence of collusion between President Trump and the Russian operatives who meddled in the 2016 campaign, Democrats are now attempting to re-define “collusion” in order to declare Trump guilty of it.
When Democrats first raised the collusion accusations after the election, they suggested that the Trump campaign had been in direct cahoots with the Russian hackers who stole emails from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta and the Democratic National Committee, before later distributing them to WikiLeaks.
“It’s very much unknown whether there was collusion,” Podesta said in December 2016, referring to Russia’s hacking of the emails.
That same month, then-Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid claimed to have “no doubt” that the Trump campaign was involved with the Russian hacking efforts during the campaign.
Someone in the Trump campaign organization was in on the deal. I have no doubt. Now, whether they told [Trump] or not, I don’t know. I assume they did. ……
THERE IS WAY MORE HERE KEEP READING: